Appendix

Predictions: Mathematical and Non-Mathematical

Falsifiable predictions of the Big Flare-Up Theory, from precise numerical targets to qualitative structural claims that can be tested by observation.

THE BIG FLARE-UP THEORY

MATHEMATICAL AND NON-MATHEMATICAL PREDICTIONS

The Big Flare-Up Theory (BFUT) calls the matter substrate the Spaticle Field. The equilibrium density is ρₛ = 7.3 × 10⁻²⁷ kg/m³.

1. Mathematical Predictions

No. Mathematical prediction Equation / quantitative result Source
1 Condensation minimum E(R)=A/R²+BR²+C+D/R; R₀=1.27348221 P16
2 Void-filling asymmetry δ_d=2δ_u from the three-sphere geometry P16
3 Void correction A_void/6 as the geometric void correction P16
4 Electron/proton mass ratio m_e_vss=mₚ/(6π⁵) P19
5 Reduced Planck constant ħ_vss=mₚcrₚ/(πR₀), with h_vss=2πħ_vss P16/P19
6 Fine-structure constant α_vss=e²/(4πε₀ħ_vss c) within the BFUT derivation chain P19
7 R₀ cross-check R₀=4ε₀mₚc²rₚα_vss/e² P19; internal consistency
8 Independent c reconstruction c_vss²=e²R₀/(4ε₀mₚrₚα_vss) P23/P19
9 Substrate stiffness Kₛ=ρₛc² P23
10 Universal acceleration scale aₛ=c√(Gρₛ/3) P18/P78
11 Finite deformation-domain radius R_d=[3M/(8πρₛ)]^(1/3) P18
12 Rotationally enlarged domain R_eff=R_d(1+v_rot²/c²)^(1/3) P18
13 Dark matter effects equation (DME) rotation law v²=v_b²[1+aₛR/v_b²]^(1/2) P18/P25/P78
14 Deep-regime baryonic Tully-Fisher law v⁴≈GMaₛ DME low-acceleration limit
15 Mass-velocity scaling v∝M^(1/4) in the deep DME regime at fixed ρₛ Derived from P18 DME
16 Fixed BTFR coefficient v/M^(1/4)=[G c√(Gρₛ/3)]^(1/4) Derived from P18
17 DME transition radius R_t=√(GM/aₛ) when aₛR/v_b²=1 Derived from P18 DME
18 DME acceleration asymptotes g_DME=√[g_b(g_b+aₛ)]; high-g: g≈g_b+aₛ/2; low-g: g≈√(aₛg_b) Derived from P18
19 Domain mass scaling R_d∝M^(1/3) at fixed ρₛ Derived from P18 DDR
20 DDR mean-density relation Mean density inside R_d is 2ρₛ Derived from P18 DDR
21 DDR boundary acceleration g_d=GM/R_d²=GM^(1/3)(8πρₛ/3)^(2/3) Derived from P18 DDR
22 Particle domain persistence scale R_d(M)=[3M/(8πρₛ)]^(1/3): electron 2.460 cm, proton 30.125 cm, neutron 30.139 cm P19A
23 Domain boundary of a massive body Ψ_g(r)=−(GM/r)D(r/R_d), D(x)=1−3x/2+x³/2 for 0≤x≤1 and D=0 for x≥1; field, potential and gravitational time dilation end at R_d P18; P19; P22
24 Carrier inverse length μₛ²=3Gρₛ/c² P18
25 Cross-scale carrier identity aₛL_s=c²/3, where L_s=1/μₛ Derived from P18
26 Spatial carrier attenuation g/g_N=e^(−r/Lₛ)(1+r/Lₛ), with Lₛ=1/μₛ P18 displayed potential
27 Newtonian-limit correction (g−g_N)/g_N≈−½(r/Lₛ)² for r≪Lₛ Derived from P18 potential
28 Asymptotic attenuation slope d ln(g/g_N)/dr→−1/Lₛ for r≫Lₛ Derived from P18 potential
29 Carrier-component rotation profile v²=(GM/r)e^(−r/Lₛ)(1+r/Lₛ) Derived from P18 potential; carrier component only
30 Finite causal mean-density bound ρ̄_max=3c⁶/(4πG³M²) P26
31 Causal limiting radius R_max=GM/c² P26
32 Universal compactness relation R_max/M=G/c² Derived from P26
33 Compact-object area scaling A∝M^(2/3), hence BFUT organised-deformation entropy scaling S∝M^(2/3) P28
34 Vacuum energy density u_vac=ρₛc² P2/P14/P23
35 H-class radial resonance mass λ_H_vss=2AR₀/π²; v_vss=6E_unit/α_vss; m_H_vss=v_vss√(2λ_H_vss)=124.75 GeV/c² P19
36 Strong-coupling geometric relation αₛ_vss∝BR₀⁴/A P19
37 Electromagnetic geometric invariant ω_c²R₀²/c² P19
38 Periastron residual statistic R_peri=Σ(peri-window power)/Σ(off-peri power) P18 test formulation
39 Pulsar phase-window statistic T_PSR=ΣW_pR_i/√(ΣW_p²σ_i²) P18 test formulation
40 S8 rotational suppression Proof-of-concept rotational collapse gives S8=0.7805 versus 0.832 radial, a 6.2% deficit P13
41 Neutral Z resonance m_Z_vss=π⁴mₚ=91.396 GeV/c² P19
42 Charged W resonance m_W_vss=256M=80.066 GeV/c² P19
43 Electroweak mixing output sin²θ_W_vss=1−(m_W_vss/m_Z_vss)²=0.23257 P19
44 Shankar configuration resonance m_Shankar c² = [E(2+2) − E(3+1)]E_unit = 2.60E_unit = 776.5 MeV P16A
45 BFUT configuration resonance m_BFUT c² = [E(4+0) − E(3+1)]E_unit = 4.70E_unit = 1403.7 MeV P16A

2. Non-Mathematical Predictions

No. Non-mathematical prediction Expected observational or physical consequence Source
1 Universal Centrality Rule Every settled galaxy should possess a primary black hole or dominant gravitational vortex at its dynamical centre. A settled galaxy lacking the primary central object would falsify the hypothesis. P6/P28
2 Rotational entrainment saturation DDR enhancement should saturate with galaxy or cluster rotation. P26
3 Rotational sustenance threshold Compact seed cores formed through collapse or explosive release should persist only when surrounding matter provides sufficient rotational coherence. P26
4 Isolated seed dissipation A seed core with no surrounding rotating mass within its domain should not persist as an organised core; its organised deformation dissipates. P26; P28
5 Antihydrogen gravitational behaviour Antihydrogen should fall under gravity identically to ordinary hydrogen. P16A
6 Stable antimatter-domain prediction Ordinary formation conditions should not produce macroscopic stable antimatter domains. P16A
7 Complete matter-antimatter cancellation Matter and antimatter configurations should annihilate through cancellation of the opposing substrate topologies. P16/P16A
8 Maintained CMB equilibrium The CMB should be continuously maintained as a thermal-equilibrium radiation field, not require a relic origin from a finite-age event. P7
9 Cosmic redshift without substrate expansion Cosmic redshift should be explainable through source-observer dynamics and photon propagation through a static substrate. P1/P23
10 Observer-bulk-flow signature Apparent cosmic acceleration should correlate with observer motion and directional sampling effects without requiring a separate dark-energy component. P4
11 Lyman-alpha interpretation The rise in Gunn-Peterson/Lyman-alpha opacity should admit a substrate absorption/percolation interpretation without uniquely requiring an expanding-universe interpretation. P11
12 ISW interpretation Observed ISW temperature correlations should admit local Spaticle field (the name the author gives to the physical matter substrate) temperature variations as a physical contribution. P12
13 S8 redshift trend Rotational suppression should be stronger at low redshift and diminish toward high redshift in the P13 proof-of-concept framework. P13
14 S8 analysis sensitivity Recovered S8 should vary materially under defensible choices of scale cuts, tomography, covariance, intrinsic-alignment model, and sky coverage, even for the same underlying synthetic shear field. P13
15 Finite-core compact objects Compact objects should possess finite organised compression cores, with the macroscopic mapping testable by future observations. P26/P28
16 No physical singularity Observations of compact objects should not require a physically realised infinite-density singularity. P6/P26
17 Information retained in compact objects BFUT compact-object dynamics should retain information in organised substrate deformation. P26/P28
18 No separate dark-matter particle requirement Galaxy and lensing anomalies should be reproducible through organised Spaticle field deformation without introducing a dark-matter particle. P18/P25/P78
19 Merger-morphology test In interacting systems, substrate-associated gravitational effects should track the organised motion of the dominant galactic matter and respond to redistribution during the merger. P78
20 Low-dark-matter galaxy behaviour Systems such as DF2, DF4 and FCC224 should remain compatible with the stellar-mass-dominated line under the BFUT interpretation. P78
21 Cosmic-scale continuity The same Spaticle field should support a continuous hierarchy from microscopic condensations through galactic and cosmological structures. P14/P16/P18