Reframes · 7
Big Flare-Up, not Big Bang
The Big Flare-Up is the first large-scale ignition of nuclear fusion in an already-existing infinite substrate. Not a creation event, not a singularity.
Vijay Shankar Sharma
Vijay Shankar Sharma
These are not open puzzles waiting for a patch. Each entry is resolved or reframed in the cited paper. The claims catalogue is the full numbered list. That list will be replaced when the updated Word file is imported.
Reframes · 7
The Big Flare-Up is the first large-scale ignition of nuclear fusion in an already-existing infinite substrate. Not a creation event, not a singularity.
Resolves / Dissolves · 13
c = √(K_s/ρ_s). Universal because all disturbances travel through one medium. Not a property of light specifically.
Resolves / Dissolves · 22
80–85% of excitations achieve stable 3+e (matter). 15–20% produce cancellation waves. Asymmetry set at formation, not by CP violation in a later process.
Papers: P16
Resolves / Dissolves · 29
Q = 2/3 is a topological consequence of 3-fold circulation symmetry. Not an empirical coincidence - a derivation.
Resolves / Dissolves · 34
Gravity → strong → EM → weak. Each requires the previous as a structural prerequisite. Standard model treats all four as separate axioms.
Papers: P17
Resolves / Dissolves · 42
For r
Papers: P17
Resolves / Dissolves · 43
Gravity is the restoring pressure gradient of the Spaticle substrate from mass-induced deformation. F1-cov is the master equation.
Resolves / Dissolves · 44
F1-cov → GR exactly in the quasi-static limit. BFUT does not contradict any tested domain of GR.
Papers: P18
Resolves / Dissolves · 52
ρ_max ~ ρ_s·(c²/(C·ρ_s²))^(1/2). Finite core replaces singularity. Physical singularities are impossible by substrate dynamics.
Papers: P26
Resolves / Dissolves · 53
No singularity means no mechanism for information destruction. Substrate encodes information in finite-core vortex structure.
Papers: P26
Resolves / Dissolves · 55
ρ_s → {α_s, α_em, sin²θ_W, m_W, m_Z} simultaneously with zero additional free parameters.
Resolves / Dissolves · 68
ρ_s satisfies every DM observational requirement: non-luminous, gravitationally active, electromagnetically ultraweak. Null particle-detector results confirm field nature.
Resolves / Dissolves · 70
Coherence threshold: gas fails (factor 12 below threshold), galaxies pass. 138 kpc separation predicted versus 150 kpc observed. No dark matter particles required.
Papers: P25
Resolves / Dissolves · 77
Derived as low-energy non-relativistic limit of F1-cov in the condensation regime. Not a postulate.
Papers: P19A
Resolves / Dissolves · 78
Exponent 2 follows from the quadratic kinetic term (1/2)(∂Φ)² of the Spaticle Lagrangian. Not a postulate.
Papers: P19A
Resolves / Dissolves · 79
Half-integer spin is the signature of condensations embedded in a continuous substrate. 720° topology explains what standard QM postulates.
Papers: P19A
Resolves / Dissolves · 82
Irreversible physical coupling of distributed substrate configuration to detector matter. No observer needed. 100-year measurement problem resolved.
Papers: P19A
Resolves / Dissolves · 88
One substrate, one field equation F1-cov, all scales. From proton (domain 32.6 cm) to supercluster (hundreds of Mpc) - same equation.
Papers: P19A
Resolves / Dissolves · 90
Not a pre-existing dimension. Time is what clocks measure: accumulated substrate state evolution at a location.
Papers: P22
Resolves / Dissolves · 91
Both arise from reduction in propagation capacity available for internal substrate processes. Two formalisms, one physical origin.
Papers: P22
Resolves / Dissolves · 95
c = √(K_s/ρ_s). Light travels at c because photons have no condensation to maintain. The substrate defines the limit.
Papers: P23
Resolves / Dissolves · 104
F1-cov → Newton (r
Resolves / Dissolves · 112
Bulk motion of ~550 km/s aligned with CMB dipole reproduces the Pantheon+ low-redshift acceleration signal. Setting bulk flow to zero collapses the signal.
Papers: P4
Resolves / Dissolves · 158
BBN prediction (5.6 × 10⁻¹⁰) answers production in the first three minutes; Spite plateau (1.6 × 10⁻¹⁰) answers present steady-state equilibrium. Different questions, different correct answers. Factor-3.5 discrepancy dissolves.
Papers: P3
Resolves / Dissolves · 191
The 10¹²¹ discrepancy arises from two compounding errors: assigning separate zero-point energies to 17+ independent fields, and adding ħω/2 to empty modes with no condensations. One field at equilibrium gives ρ_vac = ρ_s·c² = 5.30 × 10⁻¹⁰ J/m³ with no cancellation.
Papers: P27